Arguments[ edit ] Regan's position is Kantian though Kant himself did not apply it to non-humansnamely that all subjects-of-a life possess inherent value and must be treated as ends-in-themselvesnever as a means to an end. He also argues that, while being the subject-of-a-life is a sufficient condition for having intrinsic value, it is not a necessary one: If an individual possesses a moral right, that right may not be sacrificed even if the consequences of doing so are appealing. Those who satisfy the subject-of-a-life criterion themselves have a distinctive kind of value — inherent value — and are not to be viewed or treated as mere receptacles.
Tom Regan as infant. Give her just the slightest crack in the gate and pow! Like a shot she was through the gate and around the corner. I understand now that she lacked the space she needed to be the dog she was. From butcher to teaching Regan worked his way to his undergraduate degree as a butcher.
Not that I was intentionally cruel to the companion animals in my life. They were always special. But the other animals were like blocks of wood.
Tom Regan early in academic career. During the next two years Singer expanded the essay into his influential book Animal Liberation. This has made a profound difference in the classroom. Regan continued trying to enlist religious support for animal advocacy. A lovely spread of meat-free finger food was prepared.
Our sacred books say so. So do our esteemed scientists.
So, the Outs are exactly where they belong. Under the boot of the Ins. Media releases projected possible participation of more thanpeople. Nancy and Tom Regan. Tom married the love of his life in Empty Cages In Empty Cages:The Case for Animal Rights is a book by the American philosopher Tom Regan, in which the author argues that at least some kinds of non-human animals have moral rights because they are the "subjects-of-a-life," and that these rights adhere to them whether or not they are recognized.
The work is considered an important text within animal rights . by Tom Regan. In PETER SINGER (ed), In Defense of Animals The first is how the theory that underlies the case for animal rights shows that the animal rights movement is a part of, not antagonistic to, the human rights movement.
The theory that rationally grounds the rights of animals also grounds the rights of humans. In Tom Regan's article "The Case for Animal Rights", he defends the point that the center of our moral concern should not be, as John Stuart Mill claims it should, to diminish suffering and amplify pleasure but, to the contrary, to treat every individual animal in certain a way, despite the consequences.
Summary Response Paper Tom Regan’s “The Case for Animal Rights” is an insightfully powerful essay that calls for the abolition ever-prevalent use of animals. He says that “[the] fundamental wrong is the system that allows us to view animals as our resources” (), and that people will need.
In , American philosopher Tom Regan published a book called The Case for Animal Rights, which has since become an important text in animal rights theory. Before I explain Dr. Regan's views, I.
Thoughts on Animal Rights by Tom Regan. I regard myself as an advocate of animal rights -- as a part of the animal rights movement. what I have been exploring over the past ten years or so in my essays and talks and, most recently, in my book The Case for Animal Rights.
I believe the major conclusions I reach in the book are true because /5(1).