Understanding what the Table is Telling you: The following Contingency Table shows the number of Females and Males who each have a given eye color.
Study Limitations We will focus here only on what is directly relevant to the arrest and trial of Jesus, beginning with marginally the intentions of the Jewish leaders and ending with the leading away to the Crucifixion.
We will exclude, except where tangently related: The Gospels, of course, are our primary sources for the trials of Jesus. An immediate objection raised by Skeptics is a simple one - where did the evangelists get their information from?
The Apostles were an obvious source: John is noted to have accompanied Peter.
|Background||What is the probability of event a.|
|Using Contingency Tables for Probability and Dependence | Learn Math and Stats with Dr. G||Originally published as 62 Tenn.|
|CONTINGENCY TABLE ANALYSIS||Originally published as 99 Yale L.|
But even so, Contingency tables essay still leaves the question of sources open. Let's run down the possible answers and objections to them: We consider this to be the most likely answer. Jesus was with the disciples for 40 days after the Resurrection - plenty of time to relate the sundry details of what happened once the more theological stuff was out of the way.
And certainly, Peter would want to know what his Lord had been put through as he was waiting anxiously in the courtyard. More specifically, there is good reason to say that the events of the trial probably were told to the disciples by Jesus -- it would serve perfectly as a vehicle for His teaching.
He was always describing what would happen to Him, and He could very easily have used the historical details as the "I told you so Jesus was big on the fulfillment of prophecy -- cf. In point of fact, the accounts of the Passion, the earliest materials of the gospels probably recorded, contain much of this material.
This pattern of narrative-interspersed-with-theological-explication was adopted by the evangelists as a METHOD, and hence could easily be seen as deriving from Jesus as paradigm-teacher. If Jesus related His Passion in this way, it would certainly explain how the disciples picked up that practice.
And the Passion story, as the earliest, is the closest to the mouth of Jesus, and thus the least susceptible to embellishment. Also, remember that Jesus was consistently explaining His words and actions to the disciples in private afterwards -- so why would He not do it in this case?
To simply dismiss the possibility of Jesus filling in His disciples on the trial afterwards as "fruits that naive faith can yield" [Fric. CMJ, ] is presumptuous at best and circular reasoning at the worst. Certainly within the Christian paradigm, this cannot be dismissed as a possibility, if indeed as a likelihood.
However, even allowing that Jesus might not have given such an account to his disciples - which we would note as the best, and most parsimonious, explanation - other witnesses were possible, who might also have added to the mix:Inductive reasoning is a method of reasoning in which the premises are viewed as supplying some evidence for the truth of the conclusion (in contrast to deductive reasoning and abductive reasoning).While the conclusion of a deductive argument is certain, the truth of the conclusion of an inductive argument may be probable, based upon the evidence given.
Explain how contingency tables and their related statistics are used to test for significance of relations among the data. The discussion assignment provides a forum for discussing relevant topics for this week based on the course competencies covered.
Using Contingency Tables for Probability and Dependence.
Example of Using a Contingency Table to Determine Probability. Step 1: Understanding what the Table is Telling you: The following Contingency Table shows the number of Females and Males who each have a given eye color.
Note that, for example, the table show that 20 . Creating Letterheads with Microsoft Word - Creating Letterheads with Microsoft Word What you will write under this heading is the equivalent of the feasibility study which looks at the existing business practice and the problems associated with it.
There’s a lot that a contingency table can tell you, if you know the right questions to ask. How strong is the relationship shown in the table? We next need to adjust for the fact that some tables have more cells than others.
We do this by calculating the “degrees of freedom” (d.f.) for the. The two nominal degree variables are respondent’s sex and matrimonial position. The independent variable is respondent’s sex and dependent variable is respondent’s matrimonial position.
The nothing and surrogate hypotheses are Null hypothesis. H0: Marital position is independent of sex. Alternate [ ].